I am still amazed that there isn't a porn spin-off yet... whatthefuck or something like that.
OT: Partly you are right, there have been a lot of shots with breasts in them, without anything to make it an awesome shot, but do as I do: rate low and continue.
@them00ch: believe me i do vote them low. but that doesn´t help if all the other morons vote high. i am not against nudity. there are some shots that are amazing. but i see more and more shots just showing boobs like asmodai said, without anything to make it an awesome shot. tyler durden´s dick was deleted but boobs are always welcome. if you guys wanna see boobs for free than go get you a girlfriend or look at your own tits. gosh! :)
I mean I could go on.... so 1 boob shot in FF in the last 5 days, which means 1 of 2 things. 1) you are overreacting, or 2) lots of boob shots are submitted to NS but they arent popular and dont make it through to FF.
edit: I'm sure you know it wasnt Tyler's dick, it was a still from a porno spliced into the film. And porno = no no :) edit edit: I think its number 2) btw :)
I don't think we see that many shots which go through to FF with boobs in it... And I do also believe that there is more "boobs" picture in movies than "dick" pictures ;)! Of course it doesn't make any sense to take a shot, just because there is boobs in it.
Did you even read the thread? You were listened to, and answered. I showed you that there was 1 shot in about 350 that had a boob in it, which is hardly excessive :) So if lots are getting posted in NS, they arent necessarily getting through to FF.
I would just suggest the same thing I said in the first post. Vote low, move on.
Yup, there is no reason to ban those shots because it are movie stills, just like all other shots on here. And as them00ch metioned before, only few boob shots are accepted most of the time.