How do you rate more than obvious shots... that don't have anything striking ? Like this one in submissions http://whatthemovie.com/shot/41110 ? Surprised again, even tough it has been said to me before here, to see high ratings juste-because-people-know-the-movie-so-they-can-solve-it
Im not going to comment on that particular shot, I dont think its fair. But I will say I am not a fan of straight headshots of actors, and they rarely get high votes from me. Obvious shots are OK for me if they are striking visually, they can still get high votes from me.
But this is all my own personal feelings, and completely subjective, you vote however you like. If you think its worth a 2, then vote it a 2. If you think its a 10, vote it a 10. Its your choice - we cant tell you how to vote :)
Edit: beaten like a red-headed stepchild. What castaka said :)
I thought of opening another topic, but since it is about voting, I will continue on this one:
Are you influenced by the average voting when you vote ?
I will answer for myself: even if I want to stay objective when I vote, I can't help but being influenced by other peoples voting. I din't want to be. But I just realized that sometimes (not always of course), I see myself voting 7 clicking on the star that has for example 6,7. See what I mean ?
I still think it could be intersting to show the average only after one's vote.