Vanilla is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
General: Suggestions for shots that should be replaced
Bottom of Page-
a lot better yeah
-
I do not know where to ask.
I have a question regarding these two shots:
#73867
#87647
both sotd and uploaded by user Chrisy within 2 months, but have different aspect ratio/resolution.
Are they both from different DVD(I do not think you buy 2 DVDs of the same movie within 2 months) or is one from DVD and other is from some DVD screener copy?
Thanks! -
Any chance to get http://whatthemovie.com/shot/21774 without the black bars ?
It has 23 favorites it should deserve to be un-black bared if any kinda soul is up for the job, I'm thanking you in advance -
hope this helps...
OLD:
NEW:
-
Don't forget to leave a shout when you replace a shot Fireball.
-
done ;)
-
thank you very much, that was quick :)
-
-
CommentAuthormikebozzio
- CommentTimeMay 1st 2011
-
-
I dont want to start new topic (this topic is kind of similar)
It's about this shot:
http://whatthemovie.com/shot/6239
It's in movie "Les rivières pourpres" (2000)
http://whatthemovie.com/movie/les_rivieres_pourpres
And I believe its should be in "Les rivières pourpres II - Les anges de l'apocalypse" (2004)
http://whatthemovie.com/movie/les_rivieres_pourpres
(I'm not sure if I should report such things) -
I replaced a shot because it had the wrong aspect ratio + black bars.
http://whatthemovie.com/shot/5180
OLD:
NEW:
-
@Fireball: The wrist picture http://whatthemovie.com/shot/40949 : are you sure the new one is better than the old one? Because the old one shows more (of the tiled wall and the blood dripping down).
-
More doesn't mean better. The theatrical aspect ratio was 2.35:1, the shot was composed for that.
-
aril: It's just stretched in the old picture and then it seems like there is more blood and wall
-
Oh, that's OK then. I just didn't think it was possible for us consumers to own a version where there's actually more of the image showing than in the official version (@Razzomega: I actually don't think it's stretched, in the top left corner you can't see the tile row in the new one, and the blood pattern in the bottom doesn't look stretched. But I'm not trying to start an argument :-)).
-
You're maybe right;)
-
- CommentAuthortheoffice911
- CommentTimeMay 30th 2011
Aril is always right :) -
:-))))
-
Aril is right about the stretched thing, I noticed it too ...but I got no clue what kind of version it was which was uploaded here before or if it was some kind of promo shot maybe.
I basically replaced it because of what MisterZob said, imdb says the aspect ratio is 2.35:1 and that's how the snapshots came out in the blu-ray version as well (720x306). So 713x400 just didn't look right to me to be honest and I replaced it. The new version is also not so much blurred and you can see more details of the skin etc. -
-
CommentAuthormikebozzio
- CommentTimeMay 30th 2011
-
-
@aril: Yes, what's on the negative isn't always entirely shown in theaters and isn't MEANT to be shown. That's how some video releases get fucked up, when the transfer is handled by people who just don't care.
-
I replaced a shot because of artefacts.
http://whatthemovie.com/shot/96
OLD:
NEW:
The closest one I could get. (The hand is moving very fast) -
Glad to see finally someone replaced that one, I think it was one of the first with the replaceplease tag :)
-
thanks asmodai ;)
Replaced another one from this movie, due to artefacts.
http://whatthemovie.com/shot/3064
OLD:
NEW:
-
and another one, because of artefacts and a strange white object which looks like a dragon in upper left corner (which doesn't belong there)
http://whatthemovie.com/shot/5839
OLD:
NEW:
-
@efji: please follow these rules http://forum.whatthemovie.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=781&page=1 and always leave a shout below the replaced shot, explaining why it's been updated
-
@MisterZob
What did I miss ?
Only the shout below (done) and the shout on the poster's profile ?
Unfortunately Cinfils left us almost one year ago. -
Nevermind, when I first checked, your shout didn't show.
-
Those two shots have black bars :
http://whatthemovie.com/shot/44168
http://whatthemovie.com/shot/105933
I have a replacement for the second one :
DONE by Asmodai
If someone can replace it ... -
Done, thanks.
-
- CommentAuthorBernieLomax
- CommentTimeJun 26th 2011 edited
Replaced a shot because of black bars
OLD:
NEW:
-
- CommentAuthorBernieLomax
- CommentTimeJun 26th 2011
Replaced a shot tagged replaceplease (quality)
OLD:
NEW:
-
- CommentAuthorBernieLomax
- CommentTimeJun 26th 2011
Is this a shot that could be replaced? I think the quality is pretty poor... It's not tagged with a replaceplease yet. What do you think?
http://whatthemovie.com/shot/48185 -
- CommentAuthorBernieLomax
- CommentTimeJun 26th 2011
Replaced this one, black bars
OLD:
NEW:
-
On the shot you asked: Definitely. There are still many shots in the archive that don't have teh tag yet, while they need it, but also some tagged shots that are fine. So if you see a shot, where you doubt about stuff like quality: just take the shot yourself and compare them. If it improves: replace it. (this is only if the original shot is BAD quality, not just for all quality improvements, like from dvd to bluray).
-
- CommentAuthorBernieLomax
- CommentTimeJun 26th 2011
Thanks for your answer Asmo, I'll go ahead and replace it. -
- CommentAuthorBernieLomax
- CommentTimeJun 26th 2011
Done.
OLD:
NEW:
-
Great work updaters! Looks really great!
I noticed something on shot http://whatthemovie.com/shot/67002 . The left part of the shot should not be there, I guess it was a paint-black-barremoval-mixup :)
I think I copy-pasted the shot on to another one and failed to remove it.
Can someone update it? Oh and the quality isnt that great either...
Thanks! -
- CommentAuthorWinterwolf
- CommentTimeJul 5th 2011
got a question about the movie The Triplets of Belleville
the whole movie got aspect ratio 1,66:1 but the beginning (still in 1,66:1) they made it in 4:3 + gray bars filled to 1,66:1 - i think they want to show this scene is playing many decades before the main part of the movie
the right aspect should be like at imdb http://www.imdb.de/media/rm3551631616/tt0286244 http://www.imdb.de/media/rm598907136/tt0286244 The gray bars on right/left are part of the movie, because as i said, the whole movie is in 1,66:1
some people uploaded shots of the movie without this gray bars http://whatthemovie.com/shot/6479 http://whatthemovie.com/shot/52479 http://whatthemovie.com/shot/20821 This shots looks a bit nicer as http://whatthemovie.com/shot/65754 http://whatthemovie.com/shot/133361 But the first 3 shots are croped away parts of the movie, which is not allowed or? -
You're right, those shots should have bars to keep the 1.66:1 aspect ratio (assuming the DVD is indeed presented in 1.66:1, because I suspect some discs are actually cropped to 1.78:1). Not sure those bars should be grey, though... This kind of effect is used in lots of movies and bars are usually black when it happens. The grey look on http://whatthemovie.com/shot/133361 may come from wrong light/contrast settings.
-
- CommentAuthorBernieLomax
- CommentTimeJul 8th 2011
Replaced this one (lines), closest i could get.
OLD:
NEW:
-
- CommentAuthorBernieLomax
- CommentTimeJul 8th 2011 edited
Funny, when i posted the old picture here it didn't show any white lines. But the shot was tagged replaceplease and surrounded with white lines. -
there is white line on the left..but background is white and you can not see white on white..
-
good work bernie, keep going !
