Vanilla is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
General: Suggestions for shots that should be replaced
Bottom of Page-
Same goes for your suggested replacement ;) Crop the black bars, and it would be a great replacement!
-
#4366 please:
@Asmodai: done. -
Is this still running or did everybody dropped it ?
-
I don't know about anybody else, but I'm still working on some updates.
-
Same here, but I don't have access to a lot of my dvd's this week. I'll continue next week!
-
---
Updated:
http://whatthemovie.com/shot/2545
http://whatthemovie.com/shot/15092
I remember there was a list for the 1st day. Is it completed ? -
The "replaceplease" tag is still on : http://whatthemovie.com/search?t=tag&q=replaceplease
-
Oh ok. I didn't know about that.
-
-
CommentAuthorShrimpyPants
- CommentTimeJun 5th 2010 edited
-
-
http://whatthemovie.com/shot/82582
this one got the link replaceplease
is this justified?
it got very small black bars -
@Muten #4366 ( http://whatthemovie.com/shot/4366 ) is done.
-
#2520 ( http://whatthemovie.com/shot/2520 ) was distorted. I replaced it and deleted the vote delete by MisterZob
Old one:
New one:
-
And I replaced another Renaissance shot tonight:
Old one (slightly distorted and blurry): #35377 ( http://whatthemovie.com/shot/35377 ):
New one:
-
Should we replace the shots from Monsters inc for you Muten?
-
Changed a shot from Im not there: http://whatthemovie.com/shot/320
Old:
Mine:
:). The old one wasn't that bad quality, but had a "replaceplease" tag and white line on the bottom :) -
-
CommentAuthormikebozzio
- CommentTimeJun 16th 2010
-
-
I replaced to more shots from Renaissance. Since xrcc4 is still active I asked him in advance and he answered me that it was ok with him to replace these two shots.
#30246 ( http://whatthemovie.com/shot/30246 ) old version:
new version:
#46422 ( http://whatthemovie.com/shot/46422 ) old version:
new version:
-
@Muten: I did the three replacements you posted.
-
Tried to update a shot from Almost Famous, but I think the old one is fine quality, though it has a "replaceplease" tag:
Old:
Mine:
(I replaced it and then revert if you don't like it ;) ) -
Updated a shot from Deliverance http://whatthemovie.com/shot/3941
Old:
New:
And a shot from Blue Velvet:
Old:
New:
:D! -
???
What was wrong with the original shot ? -
I think it's a vast improvement actually, sharper colors and more in focus.
-
It's an improvement all right. But I thought updates were for shots that actually had something *wrong*...
-
the meaning of the replacement feature
is to replace shots that are bad quality, black bars, etc.
I think this one was not necessary -
Well I'm sorry if it shouldn't have been done, even though I think it should. I beleive it goes through an additional check by the staff, so lets wait and see what they think.
-
When I checked the original shot up close (the shot itself, without WTM-frame), I could see some artefacts, so I'll leave the replace. But please, Aralis, take a good look at the original image before deciding.
-
I don't know if this is the right place te mention it, but it ocurred to me that the following shots in Feature Films are of very bad quality (unfortunately because it are great shots)
http://whatthemovie.com/shot/86864
and I'm unsure about shot
http://whatthemovie.com/shot/86503 -
and this one:
http://whatthemovie.com/shot/87731 -
-
CommentAuthormikebozzio
- CommentTimeJun 22nd 2010
-
-
-
CommentAuthormikebozzio
- CommentTimeJun 25th 2010
-
-
I don't understand the delete votes for this shot: http://whatthemovie.com/shot/86864
I try get a better shot from my DVD...but it looks like the same.no need to replace
it is already DVD Quality ! -
I agree, there's nothing wrong with this shot. It's obvioulsy from DVD, it's not distorted nor cropped, the JPG file is not over-compressed... It's far from being "of very bad quality".
Wide shots always *seem* to be lower quality than close ups, on DVD. Because small details appear so tiny that they reach standard definition limits.
Of course, a Blu-ray shot would look better. But we already established that updates are NOT for updating perfectly OK DVD shots to Blu-ray shots.
By the way, there is nothing wrong with that shot either :
It's a low budget film, shot on 16mm, and the gritty, dirty look is intended. -
-
CommentAuthorKeyser_Soze
- CommentTimeJul 3rd 2010 edited
I would like to replace this one http://whatthemovie.com/shot/34053 with this one
There's nothing wrong with it but it is the only one in the archive with the 4:3 aspect ratio...
Let me know what you think -
-
If the dvd exists in this ratio then it isn't against the rule. If we start doing this, then there are much more movies with this situation... So I'd say no, it shouldn't be replaced
-
- CommentAuthortoffetomas
- CommentTimeJul 3rd 2010
i would just ask the uploader, personally i hate 4:3 if it should be widescreen, like most people i think, so if it was my shot you could do it. -
-
CommentAuthormikebozzio
- CommentTimeJul 3rd 2010
I hate 4:3 shots when the original is not. But I agree with @toffetomas, I think you should ask the uploader. -
-
I hate them too but I just dont think they are against any rules. If we do it for one, then we have to do for all and I dont know if it is very nice for the uplaoders. If the shot is from dvd, I dont think it should replaced
-
-
CommentAuthormikebozzio
- CommentTimeJul 12th 2010 edited
-
-
Is this replaceable ? http://whatthemovie.com/shot/23477
-
There's a green line on http://whatthemovie.com/shot/2445
If anyone can fix it -
-
CommentAuthorfreddelgado
- CommentTimeAug 5th 2010
I don't know about you, guys, but I try to repost the exactly same shot.
The old (top) and the new (botton) version:
-
-
Yeah, but please, stop replacing OK DVD shots with Blu-ray shots.
-
agree with MisterZob, there was really nothing wrong with this shot, this has to stop ;)
-
-
CommentAuthorKeyser_Soze
- CommentTimeAug 9th 2010 edited
-
-
-
CommentAuthormikebozzio
- CommentTimeAug 9th 2010
-
